Important disclaimer
Haven provides general information only. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and it should not be treated as a substitute for advice from a qualified immigration lawyer or accredited legal representative. Immigration outcomes depend on the specific facts of your case. If you need case-specific guidance, consult a lawyer before making decisions or filing.
What Happened
On September 11, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security published its [proposed rule 'Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period'](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period) in the Federal Register (Document No. 2026-18631, RIN 1615-AD22, 91 FR 57807, 22 pages). The rule would remove the provision at [8 CFR 214.1(l)(2)](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-214/subpart-A/section-214.1) that gives E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN workers up to 60 days after their employment ends to find a new employer, change status, or prepare an orderly departure.
The notice sets a **comment deadline of November 10, 2026** — the Federal Docket Management System will accept comments until midnight Eastern Time at the end of that day, under DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364. As of September 15, the docket had already received more than 9,300 public comments.
Publication is the third step in a fast-moving sequence: DHS first [previewed the proposal on August 7, 2026](/blog/dhs-60-day-grace-period-elimination-proposed-rule-2026) when it sent the rule to the White House for review, [OIRA cleared it on August 27](/blog/60-day-grace-period-oira-clearance-federal-register-2026), and now the full regulatory text and 22-page preamble are public for the first time. [Reuters reported](https://srnnews.com/trump-administration-proposes-waiving-grace-period-for-h-1b-holders-after-job-loss/) the publication, and [The Washington Post covered the rule's immediate-departure consequence](https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/09/10/new-rule-would-require-some-visa-holders-leave-us-immediately-after-losing-job/).
Who's Affected
The grace period at issue applies after cessation of the employment that formed the basis of a worker's status. If finalized, every category listed in 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2) loses the post-employment buffer:
- **H-1B** specialty occupation workers and their H-4 dependents — by far the largest affected population; DHS's own data shows 99 percent of beneficiaries who lost a job or changed employers from FY2021 through FY2025 were in H-1B status
- **O-1** extraordinary-ability workers (O-1A and O-1B) and O-3 dependents
- **E-1, E-2, and E-3** treaty traders, investors, and specialty-occupation professionals from Australia
- **L-1** intracompany transferees, **H-1B1** workers from Chile and Singapore, and **TN** professionals
The separate 10-day grace period at 8 CFR 214.1(l)(1), which applies after a petition's validity period ends, is not removed by this proposal. DHS notes it would not help workers who lose employment mid-petition, because that provision applies only after the validity period ends.
Haven can help you track this.
Turn timelines, action windows, and next steps into a personal plan grounded in your actual visa status, not a generic checklist.
What the Published Text Reveals
Federal Register publication makes the rule's full justification public for the first time, and the preamble contains data DHS has never released before:
- **1.9 million assessments.** From the beginning of FY2018 (October 1, 2017) through May 20, 2026, over 1.9 million petitions and applications required USCIS to assess whether the up-to-60-day grace period could have applied — the agency's core administrative-burden figure
- **5.77 percent transition rate.** From FY2021 through FY2025, only 5.77 percent of the 328,758 primary beneficiaries who lost a job or changed employers had a new Form I-129 filed by a new employer within 60 days of the old petition's withdrawal. Another 1.70 percent filed Form I-539 change-of-status applications and 0.59 percent filed Form I-485
- **65,752 workers per year.** The average annual number of primary beneficiaries who experienced cessation of employment or changed employers — ranging from a high of 80,034 in FY2023 to a low of 40,959 in FY2021
- **NTA exposure acknowledged.** DHS estimates that under the proposed rule some aliens may be issued Notices to Appear, incurring costs of immigration hearings before EOIR as part of removal proceedings — the rule's own acknowledgment of a foreseeable consequence
- **$131,000 median wage baseline.** DHS calculated median annual wages of $131,000 in FY2025 for H-1B workers whose revoked petition was followed by a new I-129 within the grace period — a figure it uses to estimate foregone wages if the grace period disappears
DHS argues the grace period 'disconnects the alien's lawful status from the very basis of eligibility under these employment-based nonimmigrant classifications,' and that the 2016 AC21 rulemaking did not sufficiently consider its negative impacts.
What Attorneys Should Know
The comment period is the last formal opportunity to shape the final rule, and the published preamble gives commenters new material to work with:
- **Docket and deadline.** Comments must reference DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364 and be filed through [Regulations.gov](https://www.regulations.gov) on or before November 10, 2026 (midnight Eastern). The NPRM also amends 8 CFR Part 204, so comments can address both parts
- **Interrogate the 5.77 percent statistic.** It counts only new I-129 filings within 60 days of withdrawal, and it excludes I-539 and I-485 users — and workers who used the window to depart the U.S. rather than overstay. Commenters can argue the metric understates the grace period's actual utility
- **The burden argument cuts both ways.** USCIS has performed these assessments since 2017 — over 1.9 million of them, per DHS's own data — without eliminating the provision. Press DHS to explain why the burden became intolerable in 2026
- **NTA interaction.** The preamble's Notice-to-Appear acknowledgment invites comments on how elimination would interact with USCIS's enforcement priorities, and whether a final rule would need a conforming NTA policy
- **Potential APA vulnerability.** If finalized, a reasoned-explanation challenge may be viable: DHS is reversing a 2016 policy it then defended as reasonable. Recent litigation outcomes — including the vacated $100,000 H-1B proclamation fee — show courts are scrutinizing this administration's employment-based immigration actions closely
What Applicants Should Do
The grace period is still the law today — but the window to influence the final rule, and to plan personally, is now:
- **Understand the rule is not in effect.** If you lose your job today, you still have up to 60 days to find a new employer, file a change of status, or arrange departure. A final rule is months away at the earliest
- **Submit a comment before November 10.** Individual stories carry weight — how the grace period helped you transition employers, keep your family stable, or depart without overstay. Your attorney can help polish it and file it on the docket
- **Build an emergency plan now.** Identify backup employers and understand which alternative visa categories you could pursue if the grace period disappears
- **Keep personal copies of your immigration records.** I-797 approvals, I-94 records, visa stamps, and any pending I-140 or PERM documentation — do not rely solely on your employer's files
- **Know your I-140 portability rights.** INA 204(j) protections for changing employers during a pending or approved green card process are separate from the grace period and are not eliminated by this proposal
If your employer is planning layoffs, consult an immigration attorney immediately — even while the grace period remains in effect.
Sources
Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period — Proposed Rule, 91 FR 57807 (Sept. 11, 2026)
Federal Register
Open sourceNew rule would require some visa holders to leave U.S. immediately after losing job
The Washington Post
Open sourceTrump administration proposes waiving grace period for H-1B holders after job loss
Reuters (via SRN News)
Open source8 CFR 214.1 — Basis for maintaining status and extensions
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
Open sourceFrequently asked
Is the 60-day grace period eliminated now?
No. The September 11, 2026 publication is a proposed rule — the grace period remains fully in effect. DHS will review public comments (due November 10, 2026) before issuing any final rule, which is months away at the earliest. Workers who lose their job today still have the full 60-day window.
How do I submit a comment on the grace period rule?
Comments must be submitted on or before November 10, 2026 through Regulations.gov under DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364. The Federal Docket Management System accepts comments until midnight Eastern Time at the end of that day. All submissions are posted to the public docket.
Which visa categories lose the grace period under the proposed rule?
E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN workers, plus their dependents. The proposal removes the classifications from 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2), which provides a discretionary grace period of up to 60 days after cessation of the employment that formed the basis of status.
Does the rule eliminate the 10-day grace period too?
No. The separate 10-day grace period at 8 CFR 214.1(l)(1), which applies after a petition's validity period ends, is not removed. But as DHS notes, it would not help a worker whose employment ends mid-petition, because that provision applies only after the validity period ends.
How many people does DHS estimate are affected?
DHS data shows an average of 65,752 primary beneficiaries per year experienced cessation of employment or changed employers from FY2021 through FY2025 — a five-year total of 328,758, of which 99 percent were H-1B workers. DHS also discloses that over 1.9 million petitions and applications since FY2018 required grace-period assessments.